|
zurück |
|
|
start | tarifa
2001 | hintergrund
| camps
| links
| kontakt |
Fences cannot hold back the
wind
• How we in Spain
shield ourselves from strangers
• The shift
forward in Fortress Europe
• Repatriation
agreements and inter-state cooperation
• “The largest
mass
grave in the world"
• Treatment
of migrants by the state
• Visa obligations
• Work
opportunities and access to social benefits
• Health
services
• The reaction
in society to “illegal" immigration
How we in Spain shield
ourselves from strangers
On the south side of the
Mediterranean, thousands of young
people have only one wish:
they dream of a sea passage taking
them over the Straits of
Gibraltar to Spain. It is above all the huge
economic gap between the
continents of Europe and Africa which
drives more and more inhabitants
of the Maghreb and other
African countries to seek
a better life, leave their homeland and
try their luck in the north.
With increasing economic globalization,
the growing importance of
tourism and international relations, and
the rapid spread of telecommunications,
a paradoxical situation
has arisen: while the rich
countries in the north become more and
more cooperative and move
closer to each other, the practical
possibility of getting there
becomes more and more limited for a
large section of the African
population.
Instead of reacting to increasing
emigration efforts with a
coherent policy and thereby
regulating this-movement sensibly,
the European states are
meeting the challenge, above all, by
strengthening their borders.
Spain has also been affected by the
increasing 'harmonization'
in European refugee and migration
policies, which are shifting
'fencing-in' measures and repression
to the centre of attention.
However, there are pecularities in the
Southern European states
and regions which deserve closer
observation. Whereas the
Spanish government has recently
shown itself determined
to keep immigrants away from its shores
by all possible means, there
is a deeply anchored feeling in the
population, especially amongst
people living close to Gibraltar,
that it is impossible to
stop them coming - fences can't stop the
wind!
The following article will
attempt to describe the specific
conditions of current migratory
movements from Africa to
Southern Spain, and the
reaction to this by the government,
as well as the governed.
|
top |
The shift forward in Fortress
Europe
The Straits of Gibraltar
not only separate Spain from Morocco,
but two continents quite
different in economic, political and
cultural respects. At their
narrowest point the straits measure
only fourteen kilometres,
which makes the southern Spanish
provinces the target for
'uncontrolled' immigration, purely on
geographical grounds. The
port on the southerly tip of the Spanish
coast, Algeciras (Province
of Cadiz), is one of the most important
South European trading centres.
Countless ferries shuttling daily
between the two shores connect
Algeciras to the two Spanish
enclaves Ceuta and Mellila,
on Moroccan soil. People wishing to
reach Europe without a visa
or entry permit have two possibilities
of landing on the Iberian
peninsula. They either choose the route
via the two Spanish enclaves,
or attempt to cross the straits
directly.
When potential immigrants
from Morocco, Algeria or other African
states manage to enter Ceuta
or Melilla without being checked,
many of them discover that
the next step, namely crossing to
Spain, is far more difficult.
The Spanish authorities make sure
that the ('the paperless')
cannot head in that direction, even
though they are officially
on Spanish soil. Even if they succeed
in crossing, on the other
side of the straits - whether in Algeciras,
Almeria or Malaga - further
checks and strict control by border
guards and police are waiting
for them. Meanwhile, more and
more migrants in Ceuta and
Melilla, hoping for legal status and
the opportunity to travel
on, have to spend a long time in
overflowing camps. The situation
in the camps, which have
expanded dramatically in
recent years, is marked by inadequate
sanitary facilities, lack
of drinking water and generally poor
provisions. The food, for
example, is insufficient and not at all
adapted to the needs of
different religious groups.
The Calamocarro camp in
Ceuta, originally intended for 400
people, is now notorious
all over Spain for its unendurable living
conditions. The fact that
up eo 2,000 men, women and children
from Algeria and other African
states have been locked in there
for periods of up to six
months or more has brought protests
again and again from human
rights organizations and NGO's.
The La Granja camp near
Melilla has an equally disastrous
reputation. When the move
to a new camp was delayed in
September 1999, the inhabitants
lost all patience and riots
broke out, leaving the camp
practically demolished. The
installation of refugee
camps in the Spanish enclaves is just one
more step in the shift forward
of Fortress Europe onto the African
continent. To protect the
town of Ceuta from 'undesirable
immigrants', the Spanish
government has spent some 5 billion
pesetas (ca. 63 Mio. DM)
on expanding frontier reinforcemenes.
The previous fence has proved
to be too full of holes. As the
technical installation electrifying
the fence had often failed,
countless people climbed
over it, or simply cut the wiring with
pliers. In April 1999, for
example, a young woman gave birth to a
child in Ceuta after climbing
the fence; she was nearly eight
months pregnant. With the
help of a three billion peseta budget
(ca. 38 Mio. DM), half of
which derives from EU funds, the fencing
in of these enclaves is
to be further advanced. A three-metre high
barbed wire fence and surveillance
apparatus such as
videocameras, thermal cameras
and night-vision instruments
are planned.
|
top |
Repatriation agreements
and inter-state cooperation
For years now, Spain has
been trying to enlist Morocco's help in
its immigration policy.
This has proved difficult, however, because
of the virulent political
and economic conflicts between the two
countries (Morocco's claim
to Ceuta and Melilla, arguments
about Spain's role in the
West Saharan war, conflicting interests
in the farming and fishery
sectors). Spain has repeatedly
demanded stricter exit control
from its African neighbour, as well
as a repatriation agreement
for Moroccan citizens and all others
who entered Spain 'illegally’
via Morocco; this was finally signed in
1992. Although financial
incentives were included in the
agreement, Spain criticized
its implementation sharply in the
first few years and accused
the Moroccan police of lack of
enthusiasm and corruption.
At present, the cooperation in
deporting Moroccan citizens
appears to be working satisfactorily
from the Spanish point of
view, not however with regard to the
repatriation of other migrants,
especially those from Central Africa.
A number of governments,
for example the Algerian, refuse to
cooperate in identifying
refugees caught in Spain. In December
1998, a further bilateral
agreement between Spain and Morocco
was signed, with the aim
of expanding police cooperation in the
fight against uncontrolled
immigration. A proportion of the
migrants in the camps in
Melilla and Ceuta have since been
allowed to set foot on the
Spanish mainland. In 1998 alone,
3,000 of them entered the
country; altogether it has amounted
to more than 5,000. Whereas
they had no papers of any kind at
first, most of them now
hold 'travel documents' which permit
them to seek work.
|
top |
“The largest mass grave
in the world"
With the expansion of Fortress
Europe, the Straits of Gibraltar
have become a deathtrap
for countless refugees and migrants
and is therefore described
again and again as the world's
greatest mass grave' or
'the
cemetery of the Mediterranean'.
Our organization
(Algeciras Acoge/ Algeciras
welcomes) has also repeatedly
drawn attention in demonstrations
to the shockingly high number
of refugees who have paid
with their lives attempting to cross the
straits. As a result of
the increasingly clandestine nature of
attempts to enter Spain,
it is not possible to make exact
assessments of the extent
of this secret immigration.
It is roughly estimated
that more than a thousand people have up
to now been drowned trying
to cross in the Straits of Gibraltar in `
pateras' (little fishing
boats). As a rule they have no life-belts or
radio equipment, so they
are exposed to wind and weather and
cannot call for help in
emergency. They are the 'silent travellers' on
the sea, and have to remain
concealed, and try to slip through
undetected. Very often the
tiny boats collide with the giant cargo
ships, oil rankers, ferries,
or container ships which cruise round
the Mediterranean in their
thousands. The numbers who have
died in this way will never
be known, as their bodies are seldom
found. Only a few are washed
up on the Spanish or Moroccan
shores.
In the future too, more
people will die at our front door, as they
have no legal or safe way
to enter Fortress Europe. In June 1999,
a small boat - bouncing
helplessly on the sea with fourteen
women on board - was stopped
in the middle of the straits. They
all came from Morocco and
were immediately deported by the
Spanish border police.
The following figures were
published by the Spanish Ministry of
the Interior in June 1999
and are based on particulars given by
survivors: 1998: 557 pateras
stopped, 75 people reported missing,
155 rescued from drowning,
5 corpses found.
1999 January - June): 137
pateras stopped, 10 people reported
missing, 67 people rescued
from drowning, 5 corpses discovered.
In the last few years, not
only Sin Papeles, but also large
amounts of hashish have
been found on pateras. Although
the migrants had nothing
to do with the attempted drug
smuggling, they were arrested
by the Spanish police,
presented as dangerous criminals
to the public and some of
them sentenced to long prison
sentences. In many instances,
the Spanish police no longer
differentiate between the crime of
smuggling migrants and that
of 'illegal' drug smuggling. The
growing reports of an increase
in the number of drowned and
missing people led however
to a wave of sympathy, despite all
attempts at criminalization.
On August 6, 1998, for example, the
press reported that 38 bodies
had been found three sea miles
from Melilla, a fact which
had been concealed for over a month
by both the Spanish and
Moroccan authorities.
The 'pact of silence' on
the human tragedy in the Mediterranean,
maintained by the authorities
over a long period of time, was
finally broken. In June
1999, the campaign “No more deaths in
the Straits of Gibraltar"
was launched. The objective of these a
ctivities, organized by
an alliance of Spanish and Moroccan
NGO's, was to warn potential
migrants of the appalling dangers
of crossing in small boats
and explain their basic rights to them.
As the organized crossing
in boats can sometimes cost up to
200,000 pesetas (2,600 DM),
more and more migrants, among
them many children, are
attempting to enter Spain by other
means.
A popular method is to hide
in the cabin or cargo space of a
lorry travelling on the
big ferries between Ceuta and Algeciras.
A growing number of 'illegal
passengers' has been discovered on
container ships of on the
supply ships transporting drinking water
to Ceuta. Only a few months
ago, a handful of refugees from
Sierra Leone were captured
on the tiny island of El Hierro,
which indicates a new route
from Africa via the Canary Islands
to Spain. Where a large
demand exists, there are always
commercial suppliers, who,
organized mostly in widespread
networks, are always pondering
on new routes to Europe.
El Roto, an Andalusian cartoonist,
made this point:
“You just have to turn into
a commodity, then you have
no trouble coming here".
|
top |
Treatment of migrants
by the state
Even if the total number
of migrants living in Spain is
insignificant by comparison
with other West European states
(estimates place it at 600,000'legals'and
300,000 'illegals'), Spain
has still developed in the
meantime from being a traditional
emigration to an immigration
state. The reaction of the Spanish
authorities over the last
few years has been mainly to keep as
many undesirable people
as possible away from their border, or
create the means to expel
them at once. The boat refugees
picked up in the Mediterranean
form the bulk of those deported. A
ccording to statistics published
the Policia Nacional in
1997,98.5% (22,230 out of
22,572) of those deported were
Moroccans.
Most refugees who succeed
in remaining undiscovered on entry
try to leave the southern
coastal region as soon as possible.
Their preferred destinations
are the home towns of relatives or
friends, or areas where
they can best find work: the provinces of
Murcia or Almeria, Catalonia,
Castile, or further north in France,
Italy or other EU countries.
For many migrants, Andalusia is too
close to Africa. The Law
on Aliens (Ley organica 7/1985, 1 Julio,
sobre deredhos y libertades
de los extranjeros en Espana)
basically regulates the
residence of migrants in Spain. It dates
from 1985 but is to be updated
in the year 2000, although none
of those affected expect
any improvement in their living conditions.
The Aliens Law names the
'conditions for legal residence' and
defines 'offences against
these regulations'. In the penal code,
fines of up to 2,000,000
pesetas (ca. 25,000 DM) as well as
prison sentences from six
months to three years are to be
imposed on people found
residing 'illegaly’ in Spain.
Identity checks in the interior
of the country are part of routine
measures taken by the police.
Because many local people are
familiar with the arbitrary
police practice of demanding identity
papers without a concrete
reason (it reminds them of the Franco
era), there has been repeated
criticism in the past of increased
surveillance and the growing
presence of police on the streets.
The Brigada de Extranjeros,
a very well-equipped unit, is
responsible for rapidly
expanding number of controls in streets,
railway and bus stations,
or in soup kitchens run by state welfare,
places where people are
concentrated who do not look 'Spanish'.
The police are not allowed,
however, to simply deport people
already in Spain and without
papers.
In most cases they are taken
on arrest to the commissariat
responsible; here, after
checking their identity, 'official
proceedings on voluntary
departure' are instigated, fixing the
period within which those
arrested must leave the country. After
that they are generally
released. The possibility exists of
appealing against this expulsion
order on stating humanitarian
grounds (children, relatives,
other social relationships) so as to
obtain an extension of the
time-limit. Most migrants do not do
this, because they aim to
be more careful in future in avoiding
the state control network.
If there is, however, another arrest
after expiry of the time-limit,
official deportation proceedings
are instigated (Procedimiento
de Expulsi¢n) together with the
court decision as to whether
those concerned should go to a
deportation camp (centro
de internamiento) or not.
The police report is decisive
for this There are officially six
internment centres in Spain,
with SS0 places, built in 1985 and
run by the Ministry of the
Interior. Although the authorities
repeatedly stress that they
are not prisons, internment
regulations issued in 1998
put the unendurable living conditions
in these camps (including
limitation of contacts and freedom of
movement) on a firm legal
basis. If migrants without papers are
caught, in many cases they
can avoid internment, if for example
they can prove they have
a fixed address. If those affected do
not appeal against imminent
deportation, the orders become
official and their names
recorded in the state bulletin
(Boletin Oficial Esp.).
This then leads eventually to further arrests
- with few exceptions -
then to placement in a camp and
expulsion to the country
of origin. On the whole, the main aim of
the authorities seem to
insist in demonstrating their ability to
act, to keep the situation
under control and not so much to issue
as many deportation orders
as possible.
Whereas the number of checks
and arrests has almost doubled
in the last few years (in
1996 it was 20,690, and in 1998, 40,710)
the number of deportations
carried out has remained constant
(1996: 4,800, 1988: 5,525).
There may well be different reasons
that the legal possibilities
for deportation from Spain have not
yet been fully implemented.
On the one hand, violent expulsions
have been repeatedly criticized,
and on the other, they cost the
Spanish state a great deal
of money if they involve flying migrants
out escorted by police officials.
In addition there is the fact that
Sin Papeles can be very
useful as temporary cheap labour, or it
is assumed Spain is merely
a transit country for many migrants,
who with or without expulsion
orders will travel on to countries
in the north. A further
source of information on 'illegals' already
living in Spain is provided
by the (rejected) applications for work
or residence permits (the
so-called 'cupo'). In 1999, for example,
only 30,000 out of 94,819
applications were positively decided in
Spain.
This did not however lead
to a wave of deportations, even though
the names of those rejected
are known. Moreover, migrants can
only be interned for a maximum
of 40 days. Any people who are
not expelled within this
period because of unknown citizenship,
or refusal to accept deportees
by the country of origin, or lack
of transportation facilities,
have to be released.
|
top |
Visa obligations
The phenomenon of 'illegal'
immigration was first discussed and
made public in 1991, after
the government had introduced visa
obligations for people from
Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco. Up to
this point Moroccans could
visit Spain without any restrictions;
for example, to earn money
by seasonal work at harvest time.
Many Moroccan students chose
this way of financing their
studies in their homeland.
After the restriction on freedom of
travel and residence, organized
mafia-like groups have come on
the scene. Beside these,
we find corrupt administrators and
policemen who deal in visas
and enrich themselves at the
expense of the migrants.
And then there are countless Spanish
businesses who employ people
without papers simply because
they are so easy to exploit.
[
|
top |
Work opportunities and
access to social benefits
Without a residence permit,
migrants in Spain cannot sign any
contracts. Even if an employment
is legal and social contributions
are made (which is not foreseen
legally, but still happens) no
claim to state benefits
such as unemployment benefit or medical
care is established. It
is possible to appeal to the labour courts
against an employer, be
it for false calculation of working hours,
too low wages, or no wages
at all. But most migrants do not take
advantage of even these
minimal rights, as they have to come out
into the open and thus endanger
further residence. The 'illegal'
employment of people without
papers takes place in many
sectors in Spain.
Work done by sin papeles
has one thing in common: the working
conditions are bad, the
pay is low, they have no rights and no
social recognition. Many
women without papers work as
domestics or end up as prostitutes.
Above all in farming it is
normal to employ 'illegals'
who can be deployed in various
regions and provinces depending
on the time of year and harvest.
Often the migrants turn
to solidarity organizations or Caritas so
that they can pay their
transport costs to the next place of work.
Other 'sin papeles' try
to get by with odd jobs or petty crime.
Regular work contracts,
however, require not only the right of
residence; the Spanish ministry
of labour must also confirm that
the job in question cannot
be done by an unemployed Spaniard.
According to a government
survey in 1996, only 55% of (legal)
migrants from non EU countries
had steady employment in Spain;
only half of them had a
written labour contract and their
wages were on average lower
than those of local people. The
Spanish government tries
anew every year to control the number
of such labour contracts
via contingents - the so-called cupo. For
the year 1999, 30,000 work
permits, valid for one year, were
issued for help in home
and harvest; they could, however, be
extended. From the 176,022
migrant work permits issued at the
beginning of 1999,60,939
(34.5%) went to women, most of whom
(32,883) came from Central
and South America.
Female domestics in particular,
have to endure a working day
of up to 16 hours, for monthly
wages often lying below 100,000
pesetas (ca. 1,250 DM).
A new agreement with Morocco provides
that in future, ca. 300,000
Moroccan men per year may apply for
entry visas tied to temporary
work in the farming or building
sectors (areas where the
toughest conditions exist). On
termination of their work
they must leave Spain at once. The
Spanish government will
take over the Costs of transport,
accommodation and medical
care during their stay. Similar
agreements are to be reached
with Columbia, Ecuador, Romania,
Poland and Mali.
|
top |
Health services
Principally, migrants in
Spain have, independently of their legal
status, the fundamental
right to free treatment in hospital in
cases of emergency. Usually
documents are not checked at the
hospital on grounds of the
medical code. But that is all: the right
to continuous or out-patient
treatment does not exist. To keep
track of the situation and
regain a minimum of control over it
(that concerns, among other
areas, AIDS and epidemic
prevention) metropolitan
administrations in particular, in
cooperation with humanitarian
organizations like Medicus
Mundi and Caritas, have
signed agreements for the
establishment of health
centres. There are so few of these
stations in most provinces
that, in the event of illness, migrants
without documents might
have to walk up to a hundred
kilometres for treatment.
Sometimes, health centres
are connected to hospitals. Above all,
regional differences exist,
e.g. in the province of Donosti
(San Sebastian) an internal
and inofficial agreement exists
between doctors and Basque
health authorities to include Sin
Papeles in outpatient treatment.
Usually they receive a special
pass assigning them to a
GP. In the case of specialist treatment,
the usual problems exist.
The apparent paradox is that it would
certainly cost the Spanish
authorities less to integrate migrants
into the existing health
system than to finance new institutions.
Still, this would finally
mean acknowledging the rights of these
people, which is nor in
the interests of the government.
Their interest is to put
obstacles in the way, instead of pulling
down barriers.
For the children of illegal
migrants the situation is quite different:
the Spanish government provides
welfare until they are of age. In
Ceuta, even the police have
recently drawn attention to the
unlawful practice of deporting
minor, unaccompanied refugees
to Morocco without consideration
for their special status. Human
rights organisations such
as Algeciras Acoge have also called
for better conditions and
more rights, especially for under-age
migrants, and free admission
to the Spanish health and education
system. In the meantime,
some projects and initiatives exist
that are financed by the
government, especially to support young
migrants (e.g. in sheltered
accommodation); however, only a
fraction benefit from them.
A lot of young people live more or less
on the streets and try -
often as petty criminals - to make their
way in life, with the tantalizing
promise of Spanish consumer
society before their eyes.
|
top |
The reaction in society
to “illegal" immigration
The growing number of foreigners
arriving in Spain is increasingly
generating mistrust and
fear, and in some cases even violent
reactions. Algerian immigrants,
in particular, are falling victim to
racist attacks and discrimination
over and over again.
Nevertheless, in the south
of Spain, relationships with “strangers"
have traditionally been
characterized by hospitality, especially in
the region around Algeciras.
There has always existed a tradition
of solidarity with legal
and “illegal" immigrants. However, even in
our region, the positive
attitude towards immigrants is changing to
one of rejection. Most people
think if people are “illegal" they
must have come into conflict
with the law, even more so as a
connection between immigration
(especially from Morocco)
and the drugs trade has
been established in the coastal regions.
The Straits of Gibraltar
have been a trade route for hashish to
Europe for centuries. Today,
an increasing number of people
without documents, whose
only “crime" consists in looking for a
better and more dignified
life, are taking this sea route. In those
cases where the “clandestine"
stay of immigrants is sponsored
and supported by Spaniards,
they are being threatened by fixed
penalties (fines of up to
2,000,000 pesetas appr. 35,000 DM - and
prison sentences of up to
three years). Especially those who
show solidarity with the
Sin Papeles for purely humanitarian
reasons are increasingly
criminalized by the authorities.
Certainly, there are many
commercial “human traffickers"
and employers who cynically
exploit the despair and the misery
of the immigrants - and
are (in opinion of our organisation)
rightfully prosecuted and
punished by the Spanish authorities.
However, if those who chance
to meet people without documents
on the street and take them
by car to the nearest bus stop -
out of pure helpfulness
and without taking any payment, are
portrayed as “human traffickers"
in public, this is an open attack
on the last remnants of
humanity and compassion towards the
weak in Spanish society.
During the last few years,
the authorities have undertaken to
arrest those Spaniards accused
of actively supporting “illegal
entry' and “illegal stay”
and punish them with fines or prison.
Before the introduction
of new legislation on “the fight against
illegal immigration" in
the Spanish penal code, there were a
great number of people in
our region who offered help to new
arrivals and supplied them
with essentials - water, food,
clothing, in6rmation, a
lift to the next large city or the nearest
bus stop. Nowadays, certain
streets and highways in the south
of Spain are considered
unsafe for immigrants, because public
transportation, especially
buses, is constantly being checked by
police, and tourists repeatedly
have to show identification.
Although there are still
a few people who support the Sin Papeles
as a matter of course, on
the whole, fear of prosecution is
growing. Nobody appreciates
being arrested, treated like a
criminal or risking trouble
with the police. Therefore, spontaneous
help for people without
documents has become rather the
exception today.
Prosecution by the authorities
for showing solidarity with Sin
Papeles leads to fear, and
this growing fear is supposed to
teach us that we must shield
ourselves against foreigners. In
the spring of 1998, our
support network “Acoge" launched a
campaign in Algeciras calling
for “solidarity with the criminalized
supporters of immigrants".
Thousands of people signed the
appeal, 'confessing' that
they were supporters of Sin Papeles.
Similar petitions were organized
all over Andalusia, as well as in
Barcelona and Madrid. In
Barcelona, the assembly “Papers per a
Thotom" handed 5,000 signatures
to the mayor of Greuges; in
Cadiz, the Association for
Human Rights collected 4,000, and in
Madrid the alliance “Documents
for Everybody" collected 1,500
'confessions'. Despite increasing
attempts at criminalization,
up until today a strong
interest in the development of immigration
and a deeply rooted consciousness
of the unjust fate of the Sin
Papeles exist among local
people.
This is related to the many
tragic deaths in the Straits of
Gibraltar. These deaths
are happening at our own front door.
Citizens of the coastal
town of Tarifa keep carrying flowers to
the mass graves of the drowned,
who have been buried hurriedly
outside the town without
ever being identified. Besides our
organization, there are
others helping people without documents
in securing shelter with
local farmers, or providing for a safe
journey in order to give
them a chance to begin a new life in
,,wealthy and enlightened"
Europe. The Catholic Church, with
its ongoing support of people
without documents, plays an
important role in Spain.
The Church has proved to
be an influential advocate in
numerous negotiations with
the Ministry of Home Affairs, and
besides the pulpit, it commands
privileged access to the mass
media. The Church has certainly
succeeded in putting pressure
on the state, but it avoids
any kind of direct confrontation with
the authorities. As for
direct assistance, Caritas possesses
considerable resources in
funding and personnel, and can
therefore offer various
kinds of assistance: legal aid, soup
kitchens, apartments (sometimes
even rent payments), rent
security, language classes,
job placement and payment of
transportation costs. Asylum
and sanctuary seekers can a
lso apply for financial
support from the Red Cross (up to 480 DM).
Independent initiatives
and solidarity groups are involved in
supporting refugees and
immigrants, and in political circles they
are the strongest critics,
speaking up against the state's
immigration policies and
current legislation on aliens. The
demand “Docurnents for all"
is relatively new in Spain. Up to
now, most initiatives in
this direction have been launched by
refugee and immigrant groups
in possession of legal status.
However, in something like
an echo to the “sans papiers" in
France, a movement came
into being in Spain that
called itself “papeles para
todos", demanding legalization of all
foreigners on Spanish territory
who want to stay One of the first
groups formulating this
demand was the “Assemblea papers per
tothom" in Barcelona, where
immigrants without documents
are organized. The movement
gained impetus when in October
1997 the “Plataforma papeles
para todos y todas" was
constituted in Madrid, with
an affiliation of 49 groups and
organizations. In the Basque
country this initiative is supported
by SOS-Arrazakeria; in Andalusia
- a region where the number
of Sin Papeles is considerable
- by local groups of “Andalusia
Acoge" (“Andalusia welcomes")
and the “Asociaciones por
derechos humanos" (Association
for Human Rights).
As a consequence, on the
basis of their activities more platforms
and solidarity networks
have developed in many cities in
Andalusia. Except for these
initiatives there is no movement
here that is led by people
without documents. Temporary
coalitions exist, even if
these rarely function beyond the scope
of specific activities.
One action took place in June 1998; after
52 Sin Papeles had occupied
the cathedral in Malaga, they
demanded the immediate legalization
of 215 immigrants from
Central Africa who had been
transferred from Ceuta and Melilla
and left on the street without
documents. The occupation,
which was supported by the
“Plataforma de solidaridad con
los inmigranres", ended
successfully This way, the demand
“Documents for all", as
well as the demand for civil rights for
all Sin Papeles in Spain,
gained a much wider public and
more legitimization, as
previously they had been regarded
as rather naive notions.
Furthermore, interest in
cooperation on a European level was
created, even if direct
networking has not yet progressed
beyond the early stages.
We in Algeciras and the southern
provinces of Spain are often
the first contact with Spanish
society for the new immigrants.
Besides the embassy in Madrid,
Morocco has only one consulate
in Algeciras, with jurisdiction
over the whole southern
part of the country All Moroccan
immigrants wanting prolongation
for their passports have to
travel to Algeciras. It
is quite interesting to observe the enormous
efforts made to enable those
who have settled here legally and
permanently to have a nice
comfortable trip home - mostly during
the summertime, when hundreds
of thousands take their cars
to spend their vacations
in North Africa. Many immigrants from
the Maghreb spend millions
of pesetas on their trip “home". In
the port of Algeciras they
are welcomed by a great number of
institutions and services
(e.g. Arabic-speaking staff and medical
personnel) all designed
to make the wait before embarcation as
agreeable as possible for
them and their families - which is
indeed a positive development.
Still, how would these people be
treated if they were “new
immigrants", finally trying their luck in
the north - likemany of
their compatriots before them?
In May 1999, the Spanish
Ministry of Home Affairs announced
plans for expenditure of
an additional 25,000,000,000 pesetas
(ca. 315 million DM) for
the fortification of the borders in the
south of the country. At
the core of the future measures are an
increase in personnel and
reinforcement of the border police,
with more speedboats, new
helicopters and sophisticated
technical equipment. This
includes highly sensitive radar able
to differentiate between
a boat and the crest of a wave in the far
distance; cameras reacting
to body heat which are automatically
directed towards groups
of people, infra-red night vision devices,
and many others.
The operation of this equipment
will be coordinated in Algeciras
in order to make immigration
controls at the southernmost end
of the Spanish coast more
effective. The Straits of Gibraltar are
to be off limits for “pateras"
and their unwanted cargo. The
following quotation from
the article “Subsaharianos en Espana",
by Juan A. Cebrian and Simon
Bihina, published in the Spanish
magazine “Migraciones" (3/1998),
perfectly illustrates our attitude
towards immigration: “Almost
all nations known to us today are
the results of long historical
processes, of an ongoing struggle
between preservation
of native culture and acceptance of
cultural values that
are foreign to us. The principle of a mix of
ethnic groups and cultures
has proved to be the dominant one.
The history of many European
nations shows us that the
peaceful coexistence
of diverse cultures for longer periods of
time has been a reality.
Without underestimating the difficulties
of such peaceful togetherness,
the task today should be to a
chieve common universal
values in order to facilitate intercultural
communication. This is
only possible if we accept what appears
to be fundamentally different
and foreign, and try to bring
about peaceful communication."
This article is a summary
of two contributions by Peio Aierbe
from Donostia (San Sebastian),
an activist from Mugak and
the organisation “Algeciras
Acoge" (algeciras wekomes).
(noborder.org)
|
top | |